Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Income or loss arising from assets transferred without consideration to a spouse was held to fall within section 64(1)(iv) where the Department failed to show consideration or an agreement to live apart. The Tribunal applied the principle that clubbing extends to income or loss indirectly arising from the transferred asset, so the spouse's derivative trading loss could be considered in the assessee's hands if a nexus with the gifted funds existed. The view that the loss was the spouse's independent trading loss was rejected. The matter was remitted only for verification of the quantum of loss attributable to the gifted funds.
Income or loss arising from assets transferred without consideration to a spouse was held to fall within section 64(1)(iv) where the Department failed to show consideration or an agreement to live apart. The Tribunal applied the principle that clubbing extends to income or loss indirectly arising from the transferred asset, so the spouse's derivative trading loss could be considered in the assessee's hands if a nexus with the gifted funds existed. The view that the loss was the spouse's independent trading loss was rejected. The matter was remitted only for verification of the quantum of loss attributable to the gifted funds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
