Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
321 to 340 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Transfer pricing comparables must rest on reliable, internally consistent financial data: MSL Driveline was excluded because its annual report and financial statements conflicted on related party transactions, and the threshold was treated as crossed. Under TNMM, the persistent loss filter turns on operating profit, not profit before tax, and a company with profit in one relevant year is not a persistent loss-maker; Bharat Gears Ltd. and JMT Auto Ltd. were therefore to be included. In a capital-intensive manufacturing business, depreciation differences may warrant adjustment if they materially affect margins. Transfer pricing adjustment is confined to AE transactions, not entity-level non-AE dealings. An intimation under section 143(1) issued after notice under section 143(2) lacked jurisdiction, so the adjustments were deleted.
Transfer pricing comparables must rest on reliable, internally consistent financial data: MSL Driveline was excluded because its annual report and financial statements conflicted on related party transactions, and the threshold was treated as crossed. Under TNMM, the persistent loss filter turns on operating profit, not profit before tax, and a company with profit in one relevant year is not a persistent loss-maker; Bharat Gears Ltd. and JMT Auto Ltd. were therefore to be included. In a capital-intensive manufacturing business, depreciation differences may warrant adjustment if they materially affect margins. Transfer pricing adjustment is confined to AE transactions, not entity-level non-AE dealings. An intimation under section 143(1) issued after notice under section 143(2) lacked jurisdiction, so the adjustments were deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
