Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
An intimation under return processing is not a regular assessment, so no opinion was formed and the change-of-opinion objection could not invalidate reopening; the reassessment quashment was set aside and the matter remanded for de novo appellate adjudication. On alleged bogus long-term capital gains from penny stock transactions, the Tribunal held that unrefuted documents showing purchase, demat holding and exchange sale, coupled with the absence of any specific material linking the assessee to entry operators, price rigging or exit providers, could not be displaced by suspicion or human probabilities alone; the additions for unexplained cash credit and related commission were deleted. The same reasoning applied to the later year, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
An intimation under return processing is not a regular assessment, so no opinion was formed and the change-of-opinion objection could not invalidate reopening; the reassessment quashment was set aside and the matter remanded for de novo appellate adjudication. On alleged bogus long-term capital gains from penny stock transactions, the Tribunal held that unrefuted documents showing purchase, demat holding and exchange sale, coupled with the absence of any specific material linking the assessee to entry operators, price rigging or exit providers, could not be displaced by suspicion or human probabilities alone; the additions for unexplained cash credit and related commission were deleted. The same reasoning applied to the later year, and the Revenue's appeal was dismissed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.