Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
A challenge to a show cause notice denying preferential duty treatment under AIFTA for copper tubes and pipes turned on alleged non-compliance with the 35% Regional Value Content requirement, the validity of the Certificate of Origin, and a retroactive check. The SC did not decide the merits at this stage; it issued notice, directed the Union to file an affidavit, and restrained the adjudicating authority from passing any final order meanwhile, while permitting antecedent steps to continue.
A challenge to a show cause notice denying preferential duty treatment under AIFTA for copper tubes and pipes turned on alleged non-compliance with the 35% Regional Value Content requirement, the validity of the Certificate of Origin, and a retroactive check. The SC did not decide the merits at this stage; it issued notice, directed the Union to file an affidavit, and restrained the adjudicating authority from passing any final order meanwhile, while permitting antecedent steps to continue.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.