Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Mutual fund maturity rules require proper rollover, redemption, disclosure, and due diligence; investor gains cannot excuse regulatory breaches or pen...
Page of 4798
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1161 to 1180 of 95957 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Immediate suspension of a Customs Cargo Service Provider approval under HCCAR is an exceptional measure and can be used only where an inquiry is pending or contemplated; absent a show-cause notice or other substantiated basis for such inquiry, continuation of suspension is unsustainable. The Tribunal also held that an indefinite prohibition on fresh receipt of import or export cargo was inconsistent with HCCAR, which contemplates only temporary regulation of cargo entry, while preserving the authority's power to proceed under Regulation 12 after inquiry. On the material placed, allegations of smuggling, unauthorized removal, and security lapses required regular inquiry and factual substantiation, so the continued suspension order was set aside with liberty to initiate proceedings under the prescribed procedure.
Immediate suspension of a Customs Cargo Service Provider approval under HCCAR is an exceptional measure and can be used only where an inquiry is pending or contemplated; absent a show-cause notice or other substantiated basis for such inquiry, continuation of suspension is unsustainable. The Tribunal also held that an indefinite prohibition on fresh receipt of import or export cargo was inconsistent with HCCAR, which contemplates only temporary regulation of cargo entry, while preserving the authority's power to proceed under Regulation 12 after inquiry. On the material placed, allegations of smuggling, unauthorized removal, and security lapses required regular inquiry and factual substantiation, so the continued suspension order was set aside with liberty to initiate proceedings under the prescribed procedure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4798
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
