Ratification of resignation acceptance validates separation retrospectively, while withdrawal may be refused through reasoned administrative discretio...
Nature-dependent electricity contracts receive new Ind AS accounting, hedge designation, transition and financial-statement disclosure requirements fr...
Alternative GST remedy permitted protective writ intervention for ex parte adjudication, preserving independent appellate review of input tax credit d...
Assessment against deceased sole proprietor requires proceedings against the legal representative, rendering prior assessment and appellate orders inv...
Residential waste collection classification under SAC 999423 defeats composite-supply exemption where facilitating goods are not transferred to the lo...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
261 to 280 of 96100 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Immediate suspension of a Customs Cargo Service Provider approval under HCCAR is an exceptional measure and can be used only where an inquiry is pending or contemplated; absent a show-cause notice or other substantiated basis for such inquiry, continuation of suspension is unsustainable. The Tribunal also held that an indefinite prohibition on fresh receipt of import or export cargo was inconsistent with HCCAR, which contemplates only temporary regulation of cargo entry, while preserving the authority's power to proceed under Regulation 12 after inquiry. On the material placed, allegations of smuggling, unauthorized removal, and security lapses required regular inquiry and factual substantiation, so the continued suspension order was set aside with liberty to initiate proceedings under the prescribed procedure.
Immediate suspension of a Customs Cargo Service Provider approval under HCCAR is an exceptional measure and can be used only where an inquiry is pending or contemplated; absent a show-cause notice or other substantiated basis for such inquiry, continuation of suspension is unsustainable. The Tribunal also held that an indefinite prohibition on fresh receipt of import or export cargo was inconsistent with HCCAR, which contemplates only temporary regulation of cargo entry, while preserving the authority's power to proceed under Regulation 12 after inquiry. On the material placed, allegations of smuggling, unauthorized removal, and security lapses required regular inquiry and factual substantiation, so the continued suspension order was set aside with liberty to initiate proceedings under the prescribed procedure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
