Customs valuation must use comparable contemporary imports, while confiscation fines and penalties require proportionate recalculation on reassessed v...
Depositor-protection proceedings prevail over corporate insolvency, while liquidators may recover chit receivables using copies of seized company reco...
Intermediary service classification fails where overseas admission facilitation is supplied independently, preserving export treatment and small-provi...
Satellite transponder bandwidth is telecommunication, not Business Support Service; foreign non-telegraph providers triggered no service tax liability...
Commitment proceedings gain extended timelines, structured defect refiling, and automatic resumption of inquiry after the adjusted completion period e...
Limitation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is strict, time-bound and jurisdictional: an appeal must be filed in defect-free form within the statutory outer limit, and a defective presentation cannot be perfected at leisure. The procedural period for removing defects or seeking condonation of re-filing delay under the Supreme Court Rules cannot override the Code's timeline. Once the outer limit and the defect-cure period are both exhausted, the right of appeal stands extinguished and no condonation survives. The plea for a liberal approach, including the appellant's status as liquidator and reliance on Article 142, was rejected, and sufficient cause was not shown in any event.
Limitation under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code is strict, time-bound and jurisdictional: an appeal must be filed in defect-free form within the statutory outer limit, and a defective presentation cannot be perfected at leisure. The procedural period for removing defects or seeking condonation of re-filing delay under the Supreme Court Rules cannot override the Code's timeline. Once the outer limit and the defect-cure period are both exhausted, the right of appeal stands extinguished and no condonation survives. The plea for a liberal approach, including the appellant's status as liquidator and reliance on Article 142, was rejected, and sufficient cause was not shown in any event.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4807
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
