Working-capital adjustment determines whether software-services transfer-pricing margins fall within the statutory tolerance range, eliminating any ad...
Permanent establishment deductions upheld for expatriate salaries, direct costs and trading losses, while head-office costs require fresh classificati...
Data transmission equipment classification under CTSH 8517 62 remains distinct from residual classification, with exemption evidence requiring scrutin...
Under the parallel CGST and State GST framework, State-wise registration does not permit a taxpayer to evade compliance by shifting business to another State. Where a company has obtained registration in one State but failed to file returns, leading to cancellation or suspension of that registration, it remains a defaulter under the GST scheme. That default can justify refusal of registration in another State until the earlier statutory obligations are complied with. The HC upheld denial of GST registration in Rajasthan based on non-compliance in Tamil Nadu and dismissed the writ petition.
Under the parallel CGST and State GST framework, State-wise registration does not permit a taxpayer to evade compliance by shifting business to another State. Where a company has obtained registration in one State but failed to file returns, leading to cancellation or suspension of that registration, it remains a defaulter under the GST scheme. That default can justify refusal of registration in another State until the earlier statutory obligations are complied with. The HC upheld denial of GST registration in Rajasthan based on non-compliance in Tamil Nadu and dismissed the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.