Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
Under the parallel CGST and State GST framework, State-wise registration does not permit a taxpayer to evade compliance by shifting business to another State. Where a company has obtained registration in one State but failed to file returns, leading to cancellation or suspension of that registration, it remains a defaulter under the GST scheme. That default can justify refusal of registration in another State until the earlier statutory obligations are complied with. The HC upheld denial of GST registration in Rajasthan based on non-compliance in Tamil Nadu and dismissed the writ petition.
Under the parallel CGST and State GST framework, State-wise registration does not permit a taxpayer to evade compliance by shifting business to another State. Where a company has obtained registration in one State but failed to file returns, leading to cancellation or suspension of that registration, it remains a defaulter under the GST scheme. That default can justify refusal of registration in another State until the earlier statutory obligations are complied with. The HC upheld denial of GST registration in Rajasthan based on non-compliance in Tamil Nadu and dismissed the writ petition.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.