Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Sections 73 and 74 of the GST law do not bar a consolidated show cause notice or consolidated adjudication covering multiple financial years. Limitation must be tested separately for each financial year, but that does not deprive the proper officer of jurisdiction to issue one common notice or pass one common order. The scheme also permits statements for other periods on the same grounds, supporting multi-period proceedings. If one included year is time-barred, the entire proceeding is not void; the barred portion can be severed because each financial year is a distinct cause of action.
Sections 73 and 74 of the GST law do not bar a consolidated show cause notice or consolidated adjudication covering multiple financial years. Limitation must be tested separately for each financial year, but that does not deprive the proper officer of jurisdiction to issue one common notice or pass one common order. The scheme also permits statements for other periods on the same grounds, supporting multi-period proceedings. If one included year is time-barred, the entire proceeding is not void; the barred portion can be severed because each financial year is a distinct cause of action.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
