Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Service of a show cause notice through the GST common portal was treated as valid where the taxpayers later admitted the notice was available there, so the non-service challenge failed and the best judgment assessment stood. The limitation objection also failed: the court accepted that lesser tax payment despite knowledge of the applicable rate amounted to suppression, attracting the extended period, and relied on the notification extending the annual return due date to hold that the order was passed within time. The writ petition was dismissed and the order-in-original upheld.
Service of a show cause notice through the GST common portal was treated as valid where the taxpayers later admitted the notice was available there, so the non-service challenge failed and the best judgment assessment stood. The limitation objection also failed: the court accepted that lesser tax payment despite knowledge of the applicable rate amounted to suppression, attracting the extended period, and relied on the notification extending the annual return due date to hold that the order was passed within time. The writ petition was dismissed and the order-in-original upheld.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.