Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Failure to furnish the return did not sustain criminal prosecution under section 276CC where the tax due was only Rs. 1,750 and the case fell within the proviso's monetary threshold. The HC held that the Department's objection, based on the assessee being a company and the absence of a completed regular assessment at the time of complaint, could not override the facts of the case. The later assessment order and pending penalty proceedings did not justify continuation of the prosecution. The criminal complaint for non-filing of return for the assessment year 2013-2014 was quashed.
Failure to furnish the return did not sustain criminal prosecution under section 276CC where the tax due was only Rs. 1,750 and the case fell within the proviso's monetary threshold. The HC held that the Department's objection, based on the assessee being a company and the absence of a completed regular assessment at the time of complaint, could not override the facts of the case. The later assessment order and pending penalty proceedings did not justify continuation of the prosecution. The criminal complaint for non-filing of return for the assessment year 2013-2014 was quashed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.