Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Inflated purchase additions attributed to a foreign procurement facilitator were deleted because the entity was separately incorporated, had disclosed its commission income in Singapore, and the Revenue produced no cogent evidence of sham, colourable device, price inflation, fund flow-back, or accrual of the commission income to the assessees; suspicion and uncorroborated statements could not sustain the addition. The Tribunal also treated export incentives as operating income under TNMM, held that persistent loss filters require sustained losses, and applied consistent operating treatment to routine expenses, bad debts, rates and taxes, and marketing commission. It further deleted the section 40A(3) disallowance while confirming a limited disallowance of unsupported expenditure.
Inflated purchase additions attributed to a foreign procurement facilitator were deleted because the entity was separately incorporated, had disclosed its commission income in Singapore, and the Revenue produced no cogent evidence of sham, colourable device, price inflation, fund flow-back, or accrual of the commission income to the assessees; suspicion and uncorroborated statements could not sustain the addition. The Tribunal also treated export incentives as operating income under TNMM, held that persistent loss filters require sustained losses, and applied consistent operating treatment to routine expenses, bad debts, rates and taxes, and marketing commission. It further deleted the section 40A(3) disallowance while confirming a limited disallowance of unsupported expenditure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.