Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Inflated purchase additions attributed to a foreign procurement facilitator were deleted because the entity was separately incorporated, had disclosed its commission income in Singapore, and the Revenue produced no cogent evidence of sham, colourable device, price inflation, fund flow-back, or accrual of the commission income to the assessees; suspicion and uncorroborated statements could not sustain the addition. The Tribunal also treated export incentives as operating income under TNMM, held that persistent loss filters require sustained losses, and applied consistent operating treatment to routine expenses, bad debts, rates and taxes, and marketing commission. It further deleted the section 40A(3) disallowance while confirming a limited disallowance of unsupported expenditure.
Inflated purchase additions attributed to a foreign procurement facilitator were deleted because the entity was separately incorporated, had disclosed its commission income in Singapore, and the Revenue produced no cogent evidence of sham, colourable device, price inflation, fund flow-back, or accrual of the commission income to the assessees; suspicion and uncorroborated statements could not sustain the addition. The Tribunal also treated export incentives as operating income under TNMM, held that persistent loss filters require sustained losses, and applied consistent operating treatment to routine expenses, bad debts, rates and taxes, and marketing commission. It further deleted the section 40A(3) disallowance while confirming a limited disallowance of unsupported expenditure.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.