Authentication of paper assessment orders upheld, while qualifying repairs, consumables and vendor advance write-offs remain deductible business claim...
Transaction value cannot be rejected solely on non-statutory valuation guidelines without corroborative evidence supporting reassessment of final cust...
Cross-examination rights and corroborated evidence limit customs penalties for misdeclaration in genuine import transactions involving documented clea...
Tariff classification of vehicle gear components follows the specific gearing entry, displacing motor-vehicle parts classification and related liabili...
Necessary-party requirements limit impleadment of independent entities, while deferred consideration does not create an appealable adverse determinati...
Arm's length price of intra-group managerial, testing, validation and engineering services could not be fixed at nil where the assessee had benchmarked the international transactions on an aggregated TNMM basis, shown margins above comparables, and produced documentation on service receipt, business need and benefit; the Tribunal therefore deleted the transfer pricing adjustments. On outstanding receivables, no separate notional interest adjustment survived once the underlying transactions were benchmarked under TNMM with working capital adjustment, so that addition was also deleted. The claim based on payment-basis deduction for leave encashment and bonus was rejected because the disallowance had arisen only in the intimation and not in the draft or final assessment order under appeal.
Arm's length price of intra-group managerial, testing, validation and engineering services could not be fixed at nil where the assessee had benchmarked the international transactions on an aggregated TNMM basis, shown margins above comparables, and produced documentation on service receipt, business need and benefit; the Tribunal therefore deleted the transfer pricing adjustments. On outstanding receivables, no separate notional interest adjustment survived once the underlying transactions were benchmarked under TNMM with working capital adjustment, so that addition was also deleted. The claim based on payment-basis deduction for leave encashment and bonus was rejected because the disallowance had arisen only in the intimation and not in the draft or final assessment order under appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.