Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Separate assessment orders for different years remain valid when distinct notices and hearing opportunities prevent prejudice from combined proceeding...
Under Sections 13 and 14 CPC, a certified foreign judgment ordinarily carries conclusiveness and a rebuttable presumption of competent jurisdiction, but that presumption is not absolute at the interim stage where substantial objections exist. The text explains that an exclusive ICC arbitration clause, ongoing arbitration over the same dispute, and alleged breach of natural justice in the foreign proceedings made the Russian court's competence prima facie doubtful, so the judgment could not be treated as conclusive proof of liability for interim relief. In the money recovery suit, the plaintiff also failed to establish a prima facie case, and the balance of convenience favoured the defendant, so interim injunction was refused.
Under Sections 13 and 14 CPC, a certified foreign judgment ordinarily carries conclusiveness and a rebuttable presumption of competent jurisdiction, but that presumption is not absolute at the interim stage where substantial objections exist. The text explains that an exclusive ICC arbitration clause, ongoing arbitration over the same dispute, and alleged breach of natural justice in the foreign proceedings made the Russian court's competence prima facie doubtful, so the judgment could not be treated as conclusive proof of liability for interim relief. In the money recovery suit, the plaintiff also failed to establish a prima facie case, and the balance of convenience favoured the defendant, so interim injunction was refused.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.