Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Under Sections 13 and 14 CPC, a certified foreign judgment ordinarily carries conclusiveness and a rebuttable presumption of competent jurisdiction, but that presumption is not absolute at the interim stage where substantial objections exist. The text explains that an exclusive ICC arbitration clause, ongoing arbitration over the same dispute, and alleged breach of natural justice in the foreign proceedings made the Russian court's competence prima facie doubtful, so the judgment could not be treated as conclusive proof of liability for interim relief. In the money recovery suit, the plaintiff also failed to establish a prima facie case, and the balance of convenience favoured the defendant, so interim injunction was refused.
Under Sections 13 and 14 CPC, a certified foreign judgment ordinarily carries conclusiveness and a rebuttable presumption of competent jurisdiction, but that presumption is not absolute at the interim stage where substantial objections exist. The text explains that an exclusive ICC arbitration clause, ongoing arbitration over the same dispute, and alleged breach of natural justice in the foreign proceedings made the Russian court's competence prima facie doubtful, so the judgment could not be treated as conclusive proof of liability for interim relief. In the money recovery suit, the plaintiff also failed to establish a prima facie case, and the balance of convenience favoured the defendant, so interim injunction was refused.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.