Business expenditure deduction requires proof of genuine commission payments and commercial allowability; turnover growth alone cannot validate the cl...
Article 8 treaty coverage excluded third-party airline support services, while documented demonetisation cash receipts remained accepted business inco...
Functional comparability under TNMM requires highway contract benchmarks to reflect operation, maintenance and transfer activities, requiring fresh be...
In a cheque dishonour complaint, the HC held that a disputed receipt could not be treated as inconsequential where the complainant totally denied his signatures and handwriting; forensic comparison was necessary to test the defence and aid fair adjudication. The trial court's refusal to send the document, along with admitted writings and signatures of the complainant, for FSL examination was set aside, the application was allowed, and further proceedings were stayed pending the report.
In a cheque dishonour complaint, the HC held that a disputed receipt could not be treated as inconsequential where the complainant totally denied his signatures and handwriting; forensic comparison was necessary to test the defence and aid fair adjudication. The trial court's refusal to send the document, along with admitted writings and signatures of the complainant, for FSL examination was set aside, the application was allowed, and further proceedings were stayed pending the report.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.