Condonation of Delay: directoral disputes and pending company proceedings can constitute reasonable cause, allowing a belated return to be treated as ...
Revisionary jurisdiction under section 263 upheld; faceless assessments subject to revision when AO fails requisite enquiries, remitted for fresh asse...
Limited scope of processing under section 143(1): enhancement without show cause is unsustainable; remand for residency, taxation and TDS verification...
In a cheque dishonour complaint, the HC held that a disputed receipt could not be treated as inconsequential where the complainant totally denied his signatures and handwriting; forensic comparison was necessary to test the defence and aid fair adjudication. The trial court's refusal to send the document, along with admitted writings and signatures of the complainant, for FSL examination was set aside, the application was allowed, and further proceedings were stayed pending the report.
In a cheque dishonour complaint, the HC held that a disputed receipt could not be treated as inconsequential where the complainant totally denied his signatures and handwriting; forensic comparison was necessary to test the defence and aid fair adjudication. The trial court's refusal to send the document, along with admitted writings and signatures of the complainant, for FSL examination was set aside, the application was allowed, and further proceedings were stayed pending the report.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.