Inherited property sale proceeds require capital-gains treatment where ownership is supported by evidence, not suspicion or unverified signature doubt...
Cross-examination of retracted statements is essential where foundational evidence supports a benami allegation and documented funding explanations re...
Capital-goods exemption covers plant-modernisation accessories, while the import restriction applies only to earlier capital-goods components and spar...
Constitutional judicial review permits challenges to ECIRs and connected money-laundering proceedings where coercive action affects fundamental intere...
In a cheque dishonour complaint, the HC held that a disputed receipt could not be treated as inconsequential where the complainant totally denied his signatures and handwriting; forensic comparison was necessary to test the defence and aid fair adjudication. The trial court's refusal to send the document, along with admitted writings and signatures of the complainant, for FSL examination was set aside, the application was allowed, and further proceedings were stayed pending the report.
In a cheque dishonour complaint, the HC held that a disputed receipt could not be treated as inconsequential where the complainant totally denied his signatures and handwriting; forensic comparison was necessary to test the defence and aid fair adjudication. The trial court's refusal to send the document, along with admitted writings and signatures of the complainant, for FSL examination was set aside, the application was allowed, and further proceedings were stayed pending the report.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.