Certificate-of-origin verification procedure governs preferential customs benefits; denial without retroactive verification was set aside with consequ...
Disciplinary Committee jurisdiction and mandatory investigation requirements invalidated cancellation of an insolvency professional's registration and...
Retention of seized property survives where recorded reasons support proceeds of crime, while stayed investigation periods are excluded from limitatio...
Specified income of Baddi Barotiwala Nalagarh Development Authority receives conditional tax exemption, retrospectively covering its designated assess...
Specified development authority income receives retrospective tax exemption, subject to non-commercial activity, unchanged income sources, and return-...
Unified Brand India framework introduces voluntary Trust Mark certification and funding support for export branding, packaging and global promotional ...
Origin Declaration authentication governs preferential tariff claims under India-UK CETA, requiring a validated reference number before import clearan...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
1181 to 1200 of 96046 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
GST assessment was set aside and remitted because the taxpayer's defence raised factual questions that had not been examined: whether input tax credit was inadvertently claimed under the IGST column, whether it was voluntarily reversed, and whether that reversal affected the liability imposed. The Court required the authority to give the taxpayer an opportunity to file a detailed response with supporting documents and to adjudicate the matter afresh in light of that defence and the statutory provisions. The taxpayer was also left free to seek revocation of suspension of registration by separate representation.
GST assessment was set aside and remitted because the taxpayer's defence raised factual questions that had not been examined: whether input tax credit was inadvertently claimed under the IGST column, whether it was voluntarily reversed, and whether that reversal affected the liability imposed. The Court required the authority to give the taxpayer an opportunity to file a detailed response with supporting documents and to adjudicate the matter afresh in light of that defence and the statutory provisions. The taxpayer was also left free to seek revocation of suspension of registration by separate representation.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.