Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
A claim for exemption registration filed under the wrong section code required fresh scrutiny in light of Circular No. 7/2024 and the substance-over-form principle. The HC noted that the Tribunal had not examined the circular issue, and the appellant's assertion of system error was not established on the existing record. However, because the appellant had earlier held Section 12A registration, later obtained registration under Section 10(23), and surrendered it, the competent authority had to consider whether the mistaken code and fresh application brought the case within the circular. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter remitted for reconsideration without any view on merits.
A claim for exemption registration filed under the wrong section code required fresh scrutiny in light of Circular No. 7/2024 and the substance-over-form principle. The HC noted that the Tribunal had not examined the circular issue, and the appellant's assertion of system error was not established on the existing record. However, because the appellant had earlier held Section 12A registration, later obtained registration under Section 10(23), and surrendered it, the competent authority had to consider whether the mistaken code and fresh application brought the case within the circular. The impugned orders were set aside and the matter remitted for reconsideration without any view on merits.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
