Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Reassessment beyond three years required the recorded reasons to show that the alleged escaped income was represented by an asset, expenditure, or entry in the books; absent that jurisdictional nexus, the notices and reassessment orders for AYs 2017-18 to 2019-20 were quashed. Material brought by a third person in response to summons during search could not be treated as search-seizure material to sustain notices under the search deeming fiction, so those notices were also invalid. The Tribunal further held that search information must relate to the relevant AY, and the absence of that link vitiated the notices for AYs 2020-21 to 2022-23. On merits, the wholesale two-zeroes theory on all cash entries was rejected, but 16% profit on recomputed unaccounted receipts was sustained.
Reassessment beyond three years required the recorded reasons to show that the alleged escaped income was represented by an asset, expenditure, or entry in the books; absent that jurisdictional nexus, the notices and reassessment orders for AYs 2017-18 to 2019-20 were quashed. Material brought by a third person in response to summons during search could not be treated as search-seizure material to sustain notices under the search deeming fiction, so those notices were also invalid. The Tribunal further held that search information must relate to the relevant AY, and the absence of that link vitiated the notices for AYs 2020-21 to 2022-23. On merits, the wholesale two-zeroes theory on all cash entries was rejected, but 16% profit on recomputed unaccounted receipts was sustained.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
