Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Validity of reassessment notices under sections 148 and 148A was not examined on merits because the HC followed the Supreme Court's approach in an identical matter after insertion of section 147A. The writ appeals were allowed, the Single Judge's orders were set aside, and the matters were remitted for fresh consideration. The assessees were given liberty to amend the writ petitions to challenge section 147A and any connected or consequential provision, with all rival contentions left open for decision on remand.
Validity of reassessment notices under sections 148 and 148A was not examined on merits because the HC followed the Supreme Court's approach in an identical matter after insertion of section 147A. The writ appeals were allowed, the Single Judge's orders were set aside, and the matters were remitted for fresh consideration. The assessees were given liberty to amend the writ petitions to challenge section 147A and any connected or consequential provision, with all rival contentions left open for decision on remand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.