Transfer pricing comparables and adjustments: Tribunal revisits loss-maker status, segmental comparability, working capital relief, and risk allocatio...
Business expenditure disallowance failed where commission, related-party salary and promotion payments were supported by records and inquiry was inade...
Interest merged into a decree and payable in execution retains the character of a judgment debt, so the judgment debtor cannot deduct tax at source from the decretal interest unless the decree itself authorises such deduction. The court applied the principle that a decree must be executed as it stands, subject only to adjustments permitted under the Civil Procedure Code, and held that section 195 did not extend to a decretal debt. The deduction already made toward TDS was therefore upheld, and the challenge failed.
Interest merged into a decree and payable in execution retains the character of a judgment debt, so the judgment debtor cannot deduct tax at source from the decretal interest unless the decree itself authorises such deduction. The court applied the principle that a decree must be executed as it stands, subject only to adjustments permitted under the Civil Procedure Code, and held that section 195 did not extend to a decretal debt. The deduction already made toward TDS was therefore upheld, and the challenge failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.