Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Interest merged into a decree and payable in execution retains the character of a judgment debt, so the judgment debtor cannot deduct tax at source from the decretal interest unless the decree itself authorises such deduction. The court applied the principle that a decree must be executed as it stands, subject only to adjustments permitted under the Civil Procedure Code, and held that section 195 did not extend to a decretal debt. The deduction already made toward TDS was therefore upheld, and the challenge failed.
Interest merged into a decree and payable in execution retains the character of a judgment debt, so the judgment debtor cannot deduct tax at source from the decretal interest unless the decree itself authorises such deduction. The court applied the principle that a decree must be executed as it stands, subject only to adjustments permitted under the Civil Procedure Code, and held that section 195 did not extend to a decretal debt. The deduction already made toward TDS was therefore upheld, and the challenge failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4801
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
