Retrospective cancellation of charitable registration under section 12AB(4) was unsustainable; related-party benefit allegations did not prove nongenu...
Merger control notice and disclosure rules: Supreme Court limits penalties, rejects reopening of approved combination, and sets aside adverse findings...
Interest merged into a decree and payable in execution retains the character of a judgment debt, so the judgment debtor cannot deduct tax at source from the decretal interest unless the decree itself authorises such deduction. The court applied the principle that a decree must be executed as it stands, subject only to adjustments permitted under the Civil Procedure Code, and held that section 195 did not extend to a decretal debt. The deduction already made toward TDS was therefore upheld, and the challenge failed.
Interest merged into a decree and payable in execution retains the character of a judgment debt, so the judgment debtor cannot deduct tax at source from the decretal interest unless the decree itself authorises such deduction. The court applied the principle that a decree must be executed as it stands, subject only to adjustments permitted under the Civil Procedure Code, and held that section 195 did not extend to a decretal debt. The deduction already made toward TDS was therefore upheld, and the challenge failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.