Reopening Assessments invalid where satisfaction and jurisdictional approval are absent for third party seized material, leading to quashing of assess...
Benami property exclusion from the insolvency estate: Benami Act proceedings preclude IBC tribunals from reopening attachments or treating such assets...
Exclusion of limitation period: pandemic suspension plus debtor acknowledgement can extend limitation, requiring fresh factfinding on guarantee invoca...
Wrongful retention of seized Kisan Vikas Patras and Indira Vikas Patras after deposit of the settlement amount justified compensatory interest for loss of opportunity cost, but only from the date the settlement amount was paid until actual release. Because the Settlement Commission's direction to release the instruments after deposit had attained finality, no interest was payable for any earlier period. The amount awarded was treated as restitution for unjustified deprivation, not statutory refund interest, and the Court also allowed further simple interest at 4% per annum on that compensatory amount until payment.
Wrongful retention of seized Kisan Vikas Patras and Indira Vikas Patras after deposit of the settlement amount justified compensatory interest for loss of opportunity cost, but only from the date the settlement amount was paid until actual release. Because the Settlement Commission's direction to release the instruments after deposit had attained finality, no interest was payable for any earlier period. The amount awarded was treated as restitution for unjustified deprivation, not statutory refund interest, and the Court also allowed further simple interest at 4% per annum on that compensatory amount until payment.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
