Dispute Resolution Panel objections must reach both prescribed forums; otherwise assessment may proceed and statutory appeal remains the proper remedy...
Political contribution deductions require recipient party compliance with contribution-reporting conditions; banking-channel donations alone do not qu...
Aggregation under TNMM prevents selective testing of intra-group services without comparable uncontrolled transactions, while appellate additional cla...
Protective assessment cannot duplicate identical receipts under competing characterisations; remote services did not establish a taxable permanent est...
Current account treatment of overseas tournament services removed most FEMA findings, but excess EEFC remittance and delayed repatriation remained bre...
Modification of bail conditions remains available through inherent jurisdiction where onerous deposits undermine justice and cannot recover disputed d...
A co-operative bank's TDS position on interest paid to co-operative society depositors was traced to the CBDT Explanatory Note, not the proviso inserted in section 194A(3); the Court treated the Note as binding on the Department and held that the proviso only curtailed the broader exemption available to other co-operative societies. The proviso's constitutional challenge failed because exemption from TDS is a matter of legislative policy and section 80P is only a deduction provision, not a full tax exemption. The challenge based on administrative burden also failed, and protection was sustained for non-deduction done in obedience to subsisting interim orders.
A co-operative bank's TDS position on interest paid to co-operative society depositors was traced to the CBDT Explanatory Note, not the proviso inserted in section 194A(3); the Court treated the Note as binding on the Department and held that the proviso only curtailed the broader exemption available to other co-operative societies. The proviso's constitutional challenge failed because exemption from TDS is a matter of legislative policy and section 80P is only a deduction provision, not a full tax exemption. The challenge based on administrative burden also failed, and protection was sustained for non-deduction done in obedience to subsisting interim orders.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.