Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Royalty-related transfer pricing adjustment was deleted because audited records showed that research and development costs had already been recovered from associated enterprises with a markup of about 10%, making any further adjustment for an alleged unpaid intangible component unwarranted. The adjustment on management support services was also deleted because the assessee had benchmarked interlinked international transactions on an aggregated TNMM basis, and isolating one service for a different method was impermissible. The services, allocation mechanism, and supporting evidence were substantiated, so ALP at nil could not stand.
Royalty-related transfer pricing adjustment was deleted because audited records showed that research and development costs had already been recovered from associated enterprises with a markup of about 10%, making any further adjustment for an alleged unpaid intangible component unwarranted. The adjustment on management support services was also deleted because the assessee had benchmarked interlinked international transactions on an aggregated TNMM basis, and isolating one service for a different method was impermissible. The services, allocation mechanism, and supporting evidence were substantiated, so ALP at nil could not stand.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4807 
Join Channel 
