Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment...
Page of 4826
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5861 to 5880 of 96508 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
In wholesale trading of auto and CNG components, comparables engaged in retail and after-sales trade were found functionally dissimilar under Rule 10B(2)(d), so the disputed entities were excluded and the remaining comparable kept the margin within the acceptable range; the transfer pricing adjustments for AY 2016-17 and AY 2017-18 were deleted. For transporter payments, the claimed non-deduction of tax turned on verification of a deductee certificate that had not been examined by the lower authorities, so the disallowance issue was remanded for fresh factual verification and adjudication.
In wholesale trading of auto and CNG components, comparables engaged in retail and after-sales trade were found functionally dissimilar under Rule 10B(2)(d), so the disputed entities were excluded and the remaining comparable kept the margin within the acceptable range; the transfer pricing adjustments for AY 2016-17 and AY 2017-18 were deleted. For transporter payments, the claimed non-deduction of tax turned on verification of a deductee certificate that had not been examined by the lower authorities, so the disallowance issue was remanded for fresh factual verification and adjudication.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.