Transfer pricing requires evidence for AMP transactions, functionally reliable comparables, and appropriate aggregation or Berry Ratio benchmarking me...
Revisionary jurisdiction cannot reopen share capital assessments where adequate inquiry supports a permissible view and no independent error is establ...
Reassessment jurisdiction fails where unverified portal information is aggregated without examining the taxpayer's explanation or relevance of entries...
Statutory sanction for delayed reassessment requires approval from the prescribed authority; approval by an inferior authority invalidates jurisdictio...
Transfer pricing margin adjustments require matching treatment of non-operating income and related costs, with comparability issues reconsidered on ev...
Preliminary-expense amortisation and MAT exempt-income adjustments prevailed, while trademark costs and managerial remuneration require fresh verifica...
Export valuation requires contemporaneous evidence; unrelated invoices cannot prove overvaluation, and dual penalties on firm and partner are impermis...
Penalty for failure to furnish transfer pricing documentation was deleted because the assessee had substantially complied by producing transfer pricing study reports, available segmental information and supporting documents, while the TPO accepted the benchmarking results and did not disturb the arm's length price. The alleged deficiency was only the absence of transaction-specific profitability in the form sought by the TPO, which was treated as a technical or venial breach. The Tribunal also accepted reasonable cause arising from the practical difficulty of precise AE and non-AE cost allocation in the diamond trade, and distinguished the contrary reliance on Shatrunjay Diamonds.
Penalty for failure to furnish transfer pricing documentation was deleted because the assessee had substantially complied by producing transfer pricing study reports, available segmental information and supporting documents, while the TPO accepted the benchmarking results and did not disturb the arm's length price. The alleged deficiency was only the absence of transaction-specific profitability in the form sought by the TPO, which was treated as a technical or venial breach. The Tribunal also accepted reasonable cause arising from the practical difficulty of precise AE and non-AE cost allocation in the diamond trade, and distinguished the contrary reliance on Shatrunjay Diamonds.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.