Development agreements require legal possession or effective enjoyment for capital gains transfer; permissive possession and deferred consideration de...
Prolonged sterilisation of development rights supports capital-gains treatment, while business-income disallowances cannot govern capital-gains comput...
Additional evidence in transfer pricing dispute leads to fresh examination, while tax deductions, TDS credit, fee and refund interest require verifica...
Category II AIF pass-through taxation preserves non-business income character; investment receipts cannot be reclassified without applying recognised ...
Rectification of a return could not be used to enhance business income where amounts such as rent, dividend and bank interest had already been disclosed under their proper heads, because the same sums were again added to business income due to a return-filing error. On examining the return, profit and loss account and computation, the Tribunal accepted that income taxable under other heads had to be reduced from business income when computing net profit. The rectification order was based on an incorrect appreciation of the computation, and the impugned addition was deleted.
Rectification of a return could not be used to enhance business income where amounts such as rent, dividend and bank interest had already been disclosed under their proper heads, because the same sums were again added to business income due to a return-filing error. On examining the return, profit and loss account and computation, the Tribunal accepted that income taxable under other heads had to be reduced from business income when computing net profit. The rectification order was based on an incorrect appreciation of the computation, and the impugned addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.