Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Rectification of a return could not be used to enhance business income where amounts such as rent, dividend and bank interest had already been disclosed under their proper heads, because the same sums were again added to business income due to a return-filing error. On examining the return, profit and loss account and computation, the Tribunal accepted that income taxable under other heads had to be reduced from business income when computing net profit. The rectification order was based on an incorrect appreciation of the computation, and the impugned addition was deleted.
Rectification of a return could not be used to enhance business income where amounts such as rent, dividend and bank interest had already been disclosed under their proper heads, because the same sums were again added to business income due to a return-filing error. On examining the return, profit and loss account and computation, the Tribunal accepted that income taxable under other heads had to be reduced from business income when computing net profit. The rectification order was based on an incorrect appreciation of the computation, and the impugned addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.