Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Rectification of a return could not be used to enhance business income where amounts such as rent, dividend and bank interest had already been disclosed under their proper heads, because the same sums were again added to business income due to a return-filing error. On examining the return, profit and loss account and computation, the Tribunal accepted that income taxable under other heads had to be reduced from business income when computing net profit. The rectification order was based on an incorrect appreciation of the computation, and the impugned addition was deleted.
Rectification of a return could not be used to enhance business income where amounts such as rent, dividend and bank interest had already been disclosed under their proper heads, because the same sums were again added to business income due to a return-filing error. On examining the return, profit and loss account and computation, the Tribunal accepted that income taxable under other heads had to be reduced from business income when computing net profit. The rectification order was based on an incorrect appreciation of the computation, and the impugned addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.