Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Rectification of a return could not be used to enhance business income where amounts such as rent, dividend and bank interest had already been disclosed under their proper heads, because the same sums were again added to business income due to a return-filing error. On examining the return, profit and loss account and computation, the Tribunal accepted that income taxable under other heads had to be reduced from business income when computing net profit. The rectification order was based on an incorrect appreciation of the computation, and the impugned addition was deleted.
Rectification of a return could not be used to enhance business income where amounts such as rent, dividend and bank interest had already been disclosed under their proper heads, because the same sums were again added to business income due to a return-filing error. On examining the return, profit and loss account and computation, the Tribunal accepted that income taxable under other heads had to be reduced from business income when computing net profit. The rectification order was based on an incorrect appreciation of the computation, and the impugned addition was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.