Just a moment...

Top
Help
×

By creating an account you can:

Logo TaxTMI
Call Us / Help / Feedback

Contact Us At :

E-mail: [email protected]

Call / WhatsApp at: +91 99117 96707

For more information, Check Contact Us

FAQs :

To know Frequently Asked Questions, Check FAQs

Most Asked Video Tutorials :

For more tutorials, Check Video Tutorials

Submit Feedback/Suggestion :

Email :
Please provide your email address so we can follow up on your feedback.
Category :
Description :
Min 15 characters0/2000
Make Most of Text Search
  1. Checkout this video tutorial: How to search effectively on TaxTMI.
  2. Put words in double quotes for exact word search, eg: "income tax"
  3. Avoid noise words such as : 'and, of, the, a'
  4. Sort by Relevance to get the most relevant document.
  5. Press Enter to add multiple terms/multiple phrases, and then click on Search to Search.
  6. Text Search
  7. The system will try to fetch results that contains ALL your words.
  8. Once you add keywords, you'll see a new 'Search In' filter that makes your results even more precise.
  9. Text Search
Add to...
You have not created any category. Kindly create one to bookmark this item!
Create New Category
Hide
Title :
Description :
❮❮ Hide
Default View
Expand ❯❯
Close ✕
🔎 Highlights - Adv. Search
TEXT SEARCH:

Press 'Enter' to add multiple search terms. Rules for Better Search

Search In:
Main Text + AI Text
  • Main Text
  • Main Text + AI Text
  • AI Text
Law:
---- All Laws----
  • ---- All Laws----
  • Income Tax
  • Direct Taxes
  • Benami Property
  • Central GST Laws
  • SGST - State GST Laws
  • Customs
  • FTP - Foreign Trade Policy
  • SEZ - Special Economic Zone
  • FEMA - Foreign Exchange Management
  • Companies Law
  • SEBI - Securities & Exchange Board of India
  • IBC - Insolvency and Bankruptcy
  • Law of Competition
  • PMLA - Money-Laundering
  • Indian Laws
  • Bill / Finance Bills
  • Wealth Tax
  • Service Tax
  • Central Excise
  • VAT / Sales Tax
Month:
---- All Months ----
  • ---- All Months ----
  • January
  • February
  • March
  • April
  • May
  • June
  • July
  • August
  • September
  • October
  • November
  • December
Year:
---- All Years ----
  • ---- All Years ----
  • 2026
  • 2025
  • 2024
  • 2023
  • 2022
  • 2021
  • 2020
  • 2019
  • 2018
  • 2017
  • 2016
  • 2015
  • 2014
  • 2013
  • 2012
  • 2011
Sort By: ?
In Sort By 'Default', exact matches for text search are shown at the top, followed by the remaining results in their regular order.
RelevanceDefaultDate
    Foreign exchange authorisation framework rationalised with new compliance rules for authorised persons under FEMA.
    Export of services confirmed for university consultancy work; incidental student support did not make the supplier an intermediary.
    Proceedings against a non-existent amalgamated company are void; section 87 cannot validate post-merger GST action.
    Natural justice in revocation of registration proceedings requires a fair chance to reply before a fresh order is made.
    Unsigned assessment orders are invalid; writ delay may be excused for patent defects, with remand after hearing.
    Parallel GST proceedings on the same subject matter must be coordinated to avoid multiple adjudicatory processes.
    Jurisdictional defect in assessment where the same officers issued audit observations and later passed the ex parte orders.
    Ex parte tax adjudication quashed for lack of hearing and non-speaking order; matter remitted for fresh adjudication.
    Strict construction of penalty provisions bars penalty for lower-rate sales tax payment without any turnover mismatch.
    Parallel GST proceedings barred only for the same distinct infraction; assessment quashed for failure to examine overlap.
    Substantive compliance for section 115BAA allowed; procedural delay in filing Form No. 10-IC could not defeat the concessional regime.
    Reassessment cannot rest on material already examined; reopening on the same interest income mismatch was quashed for lack of fresh information.
    Bona fide belief on capital gains treatment constituted reasonable cause, so audit penalty was deleted.
    Commercial expediency justified medical reimbursement to a key employee-director, making the company's expense deductible.
    Penalty limitation under section 275(1)(c): ITAT held time runs from the Assessing Officer's reference, quashing the penalty.
    Treaty-rate relief for dividend distribution tax and allowance of corporate club membership as business expenditure
    Depreciation on goodwill allowed where the amendment excluding goodwill was held prospective and inapplicable to the year in question.
    Binding interim judicial directions protected the assessee from TDS default and consequential interest on leave travel concession payments.
    Consequential penalty under section 271(1)(c) fails when the underlying quantum addition has already been deleted.
    Charitable exemption sustained where royalty and sponsorship receipts were held incidental to sports promotion, not business activity.
❯❯
MaximizeMaximizeMaximize
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder

No Folders have been created

    +

    Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?

    NOTE:

    Highlights
    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
    Results Found:
    Show All SummariesHide All Summaries

    Highlights

    Back

    All Highlights

    Showing Results for :
    Reset Filters
      No Records Found

      Highlights

      Back

      All Highlights

      whatsappJoin Channel
      Showing Results for : Reset Filters

      Input tax credit cannot be denied to a bona fide purchasing...

      Input tax credit cannot be denied to bona fide purchasers when supplier default is the only grievance, subject to bona fides.

      Contents
      Summary
      Note

      Note

      -

      Bookmark

      Print

      Print

      GSTJune 8, 2026Case LawsHC
      Input tax credit cannot be denied to a bona fide purchasing dealer merely because the supplier failed to deposit the tax collected from the buyer; the Department's remedy lies against the defaulting supplier, not against the purchaser. That protection, however, does not extend to sham, collusive, or otherwise non-bona fide transactions, and the authorities may proceed where material shows such infirmity. Applying the Division Bench ruling already accepted by both sides, the Court set aside the impugned demand order and allowed the writ petition, while preserving liberty to act in accordance with law if the transactions are shown to be collusive or lacking bona fides.

      Topics

      ActsIncome Tax