Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Challenge to a GST penalty failed because the show cause notice alleged non-production of proof for inward supplies and supporting documents, and the HC treated matching documents, weighment slips and RFID particulars as material to establish actual receipt of goods and valid input tax credit. It held that input tax credit is provisional and may be denied where the assessee cannot prove receipt of goods or satisfy the statutory conditions for availment. On that basis, the objection that the order travelled beyond the notice or breached Section 75(7) was rejected, the writ was dismissed, and liberty was given to pursue the statutory appeal.
Challenge to a GST penalty failed because the show cause notice alleged non-production of proof for inward supplies and supporting documents, and the HC treated matching documents, weighment slips and RFID particulars as material to establish actual receipt of goods and valid input tax credit. It held that input tax credit is provisional and may be denied where the assessee cannot prove receipt of goods or satisfy the statutory conditions for availment. On that basis, the objection that the order travelled beyond the notice or breached Section 75(7) was rejected, the writ was dismissed, and liberty was given to pursue the statutory appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.