Religious purpose exclusion versus charitable purpose: non overriding religious objects do not attract Explanation 3, registration directed under sect...
Search-assessment proviso jurisdiction, time-barred valuation reports, and denial of cross-examination vitiate valuation-based and confession-based ad...
Proceeds of crime: provisional attachment confirmed; equivalent value attachment and acquisition date fair market value upheld, Covid exclusion preser...
Challenge to a GST penalty failed because the show cause notice alleged non-production of proof for inward supplies and supporting documents, and the HC treated matching documents, weighment slips and RFID particulars as material to establish actual receipt of goods and valid input tax credit. It held that input tax credit is provisional and may be denied where the assessee cannot prove receipt of goods or satisfy the statutory conditions for availment. On that basis, the objection that the order travelled beyond the notice or breached Section 75(7) was rejected, the writ was dismissed, and liberty was given to pursue the statutory appeal.
Challenge to a GST penalty failed because the show cause notice alleged non-production of proof for inward supplies and supporting documents, and the HC treated matching documents, weighment slips and RFID particulars as material to establish actual receipt of goods and valid input tax credit. It held that input tax credit is provisional and may be denied where the assessee cannot prove receipt of goods or satisfy the statutory conditions for availment. On that basis, the objection that the order travelled beyond the notice or breached Section 75(7) was rejected, the writ was dismissed, and liberty was given to pursue the statutory appeal.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.