Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
GST portal-based adjudication is intended to operate primarily through the Common Portal, so a noticee should not be required to adopt a hybrid process by filing supplementary replies only offline during personal hearing. The text states that where a further reply was attempted but blocked by portal limitations, the absence of that material from the record created a procedural defect and raised natural justice concerns. It further notes that the authority should have a request-based facility for online filing of additional replies, subject to control, and that the matter was therefore sent back for fresh consideration rather than leaving the party to the appellate route.
GST portal-based adjudication is intended to operate primarily through the Common Portal, so a noticee should not be required to adopt a hybrid process by filing supplementary replies only offline during personal hearing. The text states that where a further reply was attempted but blocked by portal limitations, the absence of that material from the record created a procedural defect and raised natural justice concerns. It further notes that the authority should have a request-based facility for online filing of additional replies, subject to control, and that the matter was therefore sent back for fresh consideration rather than leaving the party to the appellate route.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4809 
Join Channel 
