Reopening of assessment cannot rest solely on an audit party's opinion; reassessment under Section 147/148 is impermissible and power of revision shou...
Tested party selection: functional analysis identified the least complex unit as the appropriate tested party, altering the transfer pricing adjustmen...
Safe harbour under Rule 11UA(4) was treated as curative and retrospectively applicable: where the difference between issue price and the prescribed valuation did not exceed 10%, the issue price was deemed to be fair market value, so the section 56(2)(viib) addition on shares issued to the resident shareholder could not survive. Legal and professional charges for due diligence, business evaluation and advisory services connected with structuring and growth were held to be revenue expenditure, because no capital asset or enduring capital advantage was shown; the disallowance was deleted.
Safe harbour under Rule 11UA(4) was treated as curative and retrospectively applicable: where the difference between issue price and the prescribed valuation did not exceed 10%, the issue price was deemed to be fair market value, so the section 56(2)(viib) addition on shares issued to the resident shareholder could not survive. Legal and professional charges for due diligence, business evaluation and advisory services connected with structuring and growth were held to be revenue expenditure, because no capital asset or enduring capital advantage was shown; the disallowance was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4828 
Join Channel 
