Transaction value rejection requires reliable corroboration; refundable VAT is excluded and temporary registration does not defeat new-vehicle exempti...
Appellate jurisdiction remains available where a wrist-worn gold ornament cannot conclusively be characterised as imported baggage at the preliminary ...
Written complaint requirement bars cognizance on police reports for securities offences, while unsupported breach of trust and cheating allegations fa...
Safe harbour under Rule 11UA(4) was treated as curative and retrospectively applicable: where the difference between issue price and the prescribed valuation did not exceed 10%, the issue price was deemed to be fair market value, so the section 56(2)(viib) addition on shares issued to the resident shareholder could not survive. Legal and professional charges for due diligence, business evaluation and advisory services connected with structuring and growth were held to be revenue expenditure, because no capital asset or enduring capital advantage was shown; the disallowance was deleted.
Safe harbour under Rule 11UA(4) was treated as curative and retrospectively applicable: where the difference between issue price and the prescribed valuation did not exceed 10%, the issue price was deemed to be fair market value, so the section 56(2)(viib) addition on shares issued to the resident shareholder could not survive. Legal and professional charges for due diligence, business evaluation and advisory services connected with structuring and growth were held to be revenue expenditure, because no capital asset or enduring capital advantage was shown; the disallowance was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.