Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Safe harbour under Rule 11UA(4) was treated as curative and retrospectively applicable: where the difference between issue price and the prescribed valuation did not exceed 10%, the issue price was deemed to be fair market value, so the section 56(2)(viib) addition on shares issued to the resident shareholder could not survive. Legal and professional charges for due diligence, business evaluation and advisory services connected with structuring and growth were held to be revenue expenditure, because no capital asset or enduring capital advantage was shown; the disallowance was deleted.
Safe harbour under Rule 11UA(4) was treated as curative and retrospectively applicable: where the difference between issue price and the prescribed valuation did not exceed 10%, the issue price was deemed to be fair market value, so the section 56(2)(viib) addition on shares issued to the resident shareholder could not survive. Legal and professional charges for due diligence, business evaluation and advisory services connected with structuring and growth were held to be revenue expenditure, because no capital asset or enduring capital advantage was shown; the disallowance was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.