Admissibility of electronic evidence bars undervaluation demands where printouts, retracted statements and no cross-examination leave the case unprove...
Limitation in oppression and mismanagement proceedings: prior knowledge of removal and dilution barred the challenge, with valuation directions upheld...
Insolvency professional agency governance rules amended to add nominee directors, tighten independent director eligibility, and regulate managing dire...
Safe harbour under Rule 11UA(4) was treated as curative and retrospectively applicable: where the difference between issue price and the prescribed valuation did not exceed 10%, the issue price was deemed to be fair market value, so the section 56(2)(viib) addition on shares issued to the resident shareholder could not survive. Legal and professional charges for due diligence, business evaluation and advisory services connected with structuring and growth were held to be revenue expenditure, because no capital asset or enduring capital advantage was shown; the disallowance was deleted.
Safe harbour under Rule 11UA(4) was treated as curative and retrospectively applicable: where the difference between issue price and the prescribed valuation did not exceed 10%, the issue price was deemed to be fair market value, so the section 56(2)(viib) addition on shares issued to the resident shareholder could not survive. Legal and professional charges for due diligence, business evaluation and advisory services connected with structuring and growth were held to be revenue expenditure, because no capital asset or enduring capital advantage was shown; the disallowance was deleted.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.