Statutory transfer formalities invalidated alleged share and property transfers, while retrospective record manipulation constituted oppression and mi...
Provisional attachment of laundered funds and equivalent-value property sustained, with statutory protection limited to pension, gratuity and providen...
Insolvency moratorium does not shield company officers from cheque dishonour prosecution for liability arising before corporate insolvency proceedings...
Advance-ruling mechanism governs pending GST classification, exemption and taxability disputes, limiting writ review once the specialised forum functi...
Page of 4805
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
921 to 940 of 96092 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 13(1)(b) was held inapplicable where the institution was...
Charitable institution cannot lose exemption merely because some activities incidentally benefit a religious community; retrospective registration cancellation fails too.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 13(1)(b) was held inapplicable where the institution was engaged in charitable activity and the Revenue relied only on an alleged incidental benefit to a particular religious community; the Tribunal deleted the additions for school construction and auto distribution expenses because the assessee was not shown to be created or established for that community. It also set aside retrospective cancellation of registration under the amended registration regime, holding that cancellation cannot be pushed back to earlier years absent express legislative authority, especially where the underlying section 13(1)(b) basis had already failed.
Section 13(1)(b) was held inapplicable where the institution was engaged in charitable activity and the Revenue relied only on an alleged incidental benefit to a particular religious community; the Tribunal deleted the additions for school construction and auto distribution expenses because the assessee was not shown to be created or established for that community. It also set aside retrospective cancellation of registration under the amended registration regime, holding that cancellation cannot be pushed back to earlier years absent express legislative authority, especially where the underlying section 13(1)(b) basis had already failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.