Arrest safeguards require disclosed grounds, relative intimation and transit remand, while duplicate prosecution under the CGST framework is unsustain...
Document Identification Number defects can invalidate GST assessments, with delayed challenges entertained conditionally where patent irregularities e...
Windmill commissioning evidence supported higher depreciation where grid connection and electricity generation proved operational use before the relev...
Pharmaceutical promotion and transfer-pricing comparability principles limited disallowances, while uncorroborated search allegations and unsupported ...
Business expenditure substantiation supports scrap credits, statutory payments and expense claims, while depreciation requires proof of actual busines...
Section 13(1)(b) was held inapplicable where the institution was...
Charitable institution cannot lose exemption merely because some activities incidentally benefit a religious community; retrospective registration cancellation fails too.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 13(1)(b) was held inapplicable where the institution was engaged in charitable activity and the Revenue relied only on an alleged incidental benefit to a particular religious community; the Tribunal deleted the additions for school construction and auto distribution expenses because the assessee was not shown to be created or established for that community. It also set aside retrospective cancellation of registration under the amended registration regime, holding that cancellation cannot be pushed back to earlier years absent express legislative authority, especially where the underlying section 13(1)(b) basis had already failed.
Section 13(1)(b) was held inapplicable where the institution was engaged in charitable activity and the Revenue relied only on an alleged incidental benefit to a particular religious community; the Tribunal deleted the additions for school construction and auto distribution expenses because the assessee was not shown to be created or established for that community. It also set aside retrospective cancellation of registration under the amended registration regime, holding that cancellation cannot be pushed back to earlier years absent express legislative authority, especially where the underlying section 13(1)(b) basis had already failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4805
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
