Judicial review of settlement orders cannot reopen settled customs notices, while statutory interest remains subject to verification and quantificatio...
Customs Broker licence lending for consideration justified revocation where exporter authorisation and client verification obligations were also breac...
Fraudulent import documents suspend limitation protection, while redemption of confiscated goods requires duty and interest despite bona fide purchase...
ODR arbitration participation remains mandatory after failed conciliation, while jurisdictional and maintainability objections stay available before t...
Transparency in technical bid evaluation requires disclosed standards and recorded reasons; opaque scoring invalidated tender awards and required fres...
Automated export obligation extensions remove separate regional applications after committee approval for Advance Authorisation and EPCG authorisation...
International cargo transhipment through Indian ports continues with Customs-controlled storage, re-export safeguards, and coordinated multi-station m...
Page of 4809
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
61 to 80 of 96174 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Section 13(1)(b) was held inapplicable where the institution was...
Charitable institution cannot lose exemption merely because some activities incidentally benefit a religious community; retrospective registration cancellation fails too.
Contents
Summary
Note
Bookmark
Share
✓ Copied successfully !
Print
Print Options
For full text, please login
Login to TaxTMI
Verification Pending
The Email Id has not been verified. Click on the link we have sent on
Section 13(1)(b) was held inapplicable where the institution was engaged in charitable activity and the Revenue relied only on an alleged incidental benefit to a particular religious community; the Tribunal deleted the additions for school construction and auto distribution expenses because the assessee was not shown to be created or established for that community. It also set aside retrospective cancellation of registration under the amended registration regime, holding that cancellation cannot be pushed back to earlier years absent express legislative authority, especially where the underlying section 13(1)(b) basis had already failed.
Section 13(1)(b) was held inapplicable where the institution was engaged in charitable activity and the Revenue relied only on an alleged incidental benefit to a particular religious community; the Tribunal deleted the additions for school construction and auto distribution expenses because the assessee was not shown to be created or established for that community. It also set aside retrospective cancellation of registration under the amended registration regime, holding that cancellation cannot be pushed back to earlier years absent express legislative authority, especially where the underlying section 13(1)(b) basis had already failed.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.