Mis-declaration and Concealment: confiscation affirmed, transaction value re-determined and mandatory penalty sustained; redemption allowed on payment...
Page of 4821
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
5761 to 5780 of 96408 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Demand under GST based solely on FORM 26AS entries could not be sustained where the sale deeds, if examined, indicated a prima facie sale of immovable property outside the GST levy. The HC found that the assessment proceeded on an assumed failure to produce the deeds, but once the copies of the sale deeds and corresponding FORM 26AS were considered, the underlying transaction required proper scrutiny. The impugned orders were quashed and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after notice.
Demand under GST based solely on FORM 26AS entries could not be sustained where the sale deeds, if examined, indicated a prima facie sale of immovable property outside the GST levy. The HC found that the assessment proceeded on an assumed failure to produce the deeds, but once the copies of the sale deeds and corresponding FORM 26AS were considered, the underlying transaction required proper scrutiny. The impugned orders were quashed and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
TaxTMI 
of 4821 
Join Channel 
