Composite GST notices, mandatory limitation, and same-subject bar: HC upheld valid notices but quashed overlapping proceedings and unauthorised withho...
Page of 4803
Press 'Enter' after typing page number.
3221 to 3240 of 96047 Results
❮
❯
❯❯
0 / 200
Expand Note
Add to Folder
No Folders have been created
+
Are you sure you want to delete "My most important" ?
Demand under GST based solely on FORM 26AS entries could not be sustained where the sale deeds, if examined, indicated a prima facie sale of immovable property outside the GST levy. The HC found that the assessment proceeded on an assumed failure to produce the deeds, but once the copies of the sale deeds and corresponding FORM 26AS were considered, the underlying transaction required proper scrutiny. The impugned orders were quashed and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after notice.
Demand under GST based solely on FORM 26AS entries could not be sustained where the sale deeds, if examined, indicated a prima facie sale of immovable property outside the GST levy. The HC found that the assessment proceeded on an assumed failure to produce the deeds, but once the copies of the sale deeds and corresponding FORM 26AS were considered, the underlying transaction required proper scrutiny. The impugned orders were quashed and the matter was remitted for fresh adjudication after notice.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.
TaxTMI 
of 4803
Join Channel
TaxTMI 
