Independent show-cause notices remain separate proceedings, while customs adjudication challenges should ordinarily follow the statutory appellate rem...
Institutional incapacity in customs settlement proceedings excludes non-functional quorum periods from statutory disposal timelines, preventing automa...
Interactive touchscreen panels with integrated computing functions fall under automatic data-processing machines rather than display monitors for cust...
Ex parte injunction service requirements were substantially met, while civil recovery and SFIO investigation into provident fund defalcation continued...
Enforcement of resolution-plan directions continues without a Supreme Court stay, preventing suspension of redistribution and escrowed-fund distributi...
Third-party ownership claims over attached property require Special Court adjudication where purchasers lack registered sale deeds and bona fides rema...
Pure-agent reimbursements in clearing and forwarding services are excluded from taxable value when qualifying third-party payments are properly record...
A GST assessment confirming a proposed demand was set aside where the adjudication was non-reasoned and did not meaningfully deal with the assessee's reply. Although the reply had been received and acknowledged, the order merely said it was not in order and that records were not produced, without a proper discussion of the objections; the assessment was quashed and remitted for fresh decision on merits. The text also notes that calling the assessee for personal hearing before requiring a reply was procedurally improper, and due notice and proper process were directed before any final order.
A GST assessment confirming a proposed demand was set aside where the adjudication was non-reasoned and did not meaningfully deal with the assessee's reply. Although the reply had been received and acknowledged, the order merely said it was not in order and that records were not produced, without a proper discussion of the objections; the assessment was quashed and remitted for fresh decision on merits. The text also notes that calling the assessee for personal hearing before requiring a reply was procedurally improper, and due notice and proper process were directed before any final order.
Note: It is a system-generated summary and is for quick reference only.